Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2014
Publication Title
Argument and Computation
Volume
5
Issue
2-3
First Page
139
Last Page
159
Abstract
This paper takes an argumentation approach to find the place of trust in a method for evaluating arguments from expert opinion. The method uses the argumentation scheme for argument from expert opinion along with its matching set of critical questions. It shows how to use this scheme in three formal computational argumentation models that provide tools to analyze and evaluate instances of argument from expert opinion. The paper uses several examples to illustrate the use of these tools. A conclusion of the paper is that from an argumentation point of view, it is better to critically question arguments from expert opinion than to accept or reject them based solely on trust.
Recommended Citation
Walton, Douglas. (2014). On a Razor's Edge: Evaluating Arguments from Expert Opinion. Argument and Computation, 5 (2-3), 139-159.
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/crrarpub/25