Exploring the Benefits of Double Gloving During Surgery
article, bloodborne bacterium, Blood-Borne Pathogens, comparative study, cross infection, disease transmission, Double gloving, equipment, Equipment Failure, Gloves, Surgical, Health care-associated infections, human, Humans, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, methodology, Needlestick Injuries, needlestick injury, Operating Room Nursing, operating room personnel, Patient safety, risk reduction, Risk Reduction Behavior, surgical glove, Surgical gloves
Breaches in the glove barrier pose a risk for transmission of bloodborne pathogens during surgical procedures. Double gloving or double gloving with an indicator glove system may provide added protection. For this 24-month study, we used a comparative design to examine the effect of double gloving with inner indicator gloves on the durability of inner gloves and the detection of glove tears or perforations during surgery. The frequency of seeing blood on the hand after surgery was greater with single gloving than with double gloving, and the frequency of changing gloves during surgery was significantly higher among those who double gloved with an indicator glove system versus double gloving alone. The majority of health care providers in our study expressed favorable views about double gloving. © 2012 AORN, Inc.
Korniewicz, D. and El-Masri, M. (2012). Exploring the Benefits of Double Gloving During Surgery. AORN Journal, 95 (3), 328-336.