Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2014

Publication Title

Journal of Business Ethics

DOI

10.1007/s10551-013-1903-z

Keywords

China, Competitive Advantage, Environmental Proactivity, Motivation, Reputation, Stakeholder Pressure

Abstract

China is the world’s second largest economy and the largest emitter of carbon dioxide, yet we know little about environmental proactivity in the most populated country in the world. We address this gap through a survey of 161 Chinese companies with two respondents per firm (N = 322) where we seek to identify the antecedents and consequences of environmental proactivity. We identify two categorizations of environmental proactivity: Environmental operational improvements and environmental reporting. We find that ecological motivations and regulatory stakeholder pressure are positively related to both types of environmental proactivity, and external stakeholder pressure is negatively related to environmental reporting. Furthermore, we find that (1) if a firm is environmentally proactive (as it relates to either measure) and they are ecologically motivated, there is a positive and significant cost advantage, and (2) if a firm makes use of environmental operational improvement and they are competitively motivated, there is a positive and significant reputation advantage. Implications for researchers, managers, and policy-makers in China are discussed.

Comments

Author's Accepted Manuscript of a forthcoming publication in the Journal of Business Ethics (http://link.springer.com/journal/10551). The final publication is available at link.springer.com