Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
backing, data, fallacy, J. Anthony Blair, qualifier, Ralph Johnson, Stephen Toulmin, Toulmin model, warrant
Start Date
22-5-2013 9:00 AM
End Date
25-5-2013 5:00 PM
Abstract
This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that improves upon previous attempts to understand fallacies on this argument scheme. To do this I examine Johnson and Blair’s (1983) taxonomy of three basic fallacies (irrelevant reason, hasty conclusion and problematic premise) on Toulmin’s layout.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Bart Garssen, Commentary on: Andrew Pineau's "The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument
Reader's Reactions
Bart Garssen, Commentary on: Andrew Pineau's "The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument (May 2013)
Included in
The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument
University of Windsor
This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that improves upon previous attempts to understand fallacies on this argument scheme. To do this I examine Johnson and Blair’s (1983) taxonomy of three basic fallacies (irrelevant reason, hasty conclusion and problematic premise) on Toulmin’s layout.
