Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1996
Publication Title
Informal Logic
Volume
18
Issue
1
First Page
17
Keywords
argumentation, audience, fallacies, objective standards, pragma-dialectics, rhetoric
Last Page
33
Abstract
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularly the treatment of fallacies. While the pragma-dialectieians claim that dialectics combines the logical and rhetorical approaches to argumentation, it is argued here that the perspective relies heavily on rhetorical features that have been suppressed in the account and that overlooking these features leads to significant problems in the pragma-dialectical perspective. In light of these problems, the author advocates turning attention to a rhetorical account which subsumes the logical and dialectical.
Recommended Citation
Tindale, Christopher. (1996). Fallacies in Transition: An Assessment of the Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Informal Logic, 18 (1), 17-33.
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/philosophypub/22
Comments
This article was first published in Informal Logic.