Title
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1996
Publication Title
Informal Logic
Volume
18
First Page
105
Last Page
129
Abstract
Most informal logic texts and articles assume a verbal account of reasoning which defines "argument" as a set of sentences. The present paper broadens this definition in order to account for "visual arguments" which are communicated with nonverbal visual images. Standard approaches to verbal arguments are extended in a way that allows them to explain and evaluate visual argumentation.
Recommended Citation
Groarke, Leo. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic, 18, 105-129.
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/philosophypub/24
Comments
This article was first published in Informal Logic.