Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
argumentation, interdisciplinarity, logic, multidisciplinarity, Perelman, philosophy, post-modernity, relativism, rhetoric, Toulmin.
Start Date
22-5-2013 9:00 AM
End Date
25-5-2013 5:00 PM
Abstract
The author holds that the old theory according to which philosophy is the matrix of argumentation studies must be entirely reviewed currently. He argues that argumentation theory, as an interdisciplinary domain, may start playing, in new terms, the role which ― in the Cartesian tree ― was that of philosophy as the trunk of the different branches of human knowledge, as long as a set of requirements, which he lists, were met.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Christopher W. Tindale, Commentary on: Henrique Jales Ribeiro's "What argumentation (theory) can do for philosophy in the 21st century"
Reader's Reactions
Christopher W. Tindale, Commentary on: Henrique Jales Ribeiro's "What argumentation (theory) can do for philosophy in the 21st century" (May 2013)
Included in
What argumentation (theory) can do for philosophy in the 21st century
University of Windsor
The author holds that the old theory according to which philosophy is the matrix of argumentation studies must be entirely reviewed currently. He argues that argumentation theory, as an interdisciplinary domain, may start playing, in new terms, the role which ― in the Cartesian tree ― was that of philosophy as the trunk of the different branches of human knowledge, as long as a set of requirements, which he lists, were met.
