Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Commentary
Keywords
deliberation dialogue, disagreement, policy options
Start Date
18-5-2016 9:00 AM
End Date
21-5-2016 5:00 PM
Abstract
Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C W Krabbe, Splitting a difference of opinion
Included in
Commentary on Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”
University of Windsor
Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.
