Saturday

Subscribe to RSS Feed

2020
Thursday, June 4th
3:01 AM

Commentary on Leo Groarke, "The End of Argument"

John Anthony Blair, University of Windsor, CRRAR

Room 2

3:01 AM - 4:00 AM

Friday, June 5th
11:01 AM

Commentary on Exploring Gendered Nonverbal Behavior in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Debates

Christopher W. Tindale, University of Windsor

Room 3

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

Saturday, June 6th
8:00 AM

The Problem of Mission Creep: Argumentation Theory meets Military History

Tone Kvernbekk, University of Oslo
Ola Bøe-Hansen, Norwegian Armed Forces
Ole A. Heintz, Norwegian Armed Forces
Daniel H. Cohen, Colby College

Room 3

8:00 AM - 8:00 AM

Argumentation in Philosophical Practice: An Empirical Study

Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology - Melbourne
Michael Dickinson, Florida Institute of Technology - Melbourne

Room 2

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

Why missing premises can be missed: Evaluating arguments by determining their argumentative lever

Jean H.M. Wagemans, University of Amsterdam

Room 1

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

8:01 AM

Comments on Wagemans' "Argument levers"

Hans Vilhelm Hansen, University of Windsor

Room 1

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

Commentary on "The Problem of Mission Creep"

Curtis Scott Jacobs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Room 3

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

Automated Argument Analysis – Comment on: Mizrahi & Dickinson: "Argumentation in Philosophical Practice: An Empirical Study"

Christoph Lumer, University of Siena

Room 2

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

Commentary: Automated Argument Analysis – Comment on: Mizrahi & Dickinson: "Argumentation in Philosophical Practice: An Empirical Study"

Christoph Lumer, University of Siena

Room 2

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

9:00 AM

What makes us change our minds in our everyday life? Working through evidence and persuasion, events and experiences.

Jens E. Kjeldsen, University of Bergen, Department of Information Science and Media Studies

Room 2

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Connectives and Straw Men. Experimental approach on French and English.

Jennifer Schumann, University of Berne
Sandrine Zufferey, University of Berne

Room 1

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

The Notion of On-balance Premise Reconsidered

Robert Xie

Room 3

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

9:01 AM

Commentary on Yun Xie's "The Notion of On-Balance Premise Reconsidered"

Derek Allen, University of Toronto

Room 3

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

Commentary on “Connectives and Straw Men: Experimental Approach on French and English“ by Jennifer Schumann and Sandrine Zufferey.

Jan Albert van Laar, University of Groningen

Room 1

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

Commentary on Jens Kjeldsen’s “What makes us change our minds in everyday life?”

Harry Weger Jr., University of Central Florida

Room 2

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

10:00 AM

Between Evidence and Facts: An Argumentative Perspective of Legal Evidence

Wenjing Du, East China University of Political Science and Law, Wenbo Academy
Minghui Xiong, Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic & Cognition and Department of Philosophy

Room 2

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Coding empathy

Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Chrysi Rapanta, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Room 3

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Piggybacking In? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Argumentation Schemes

Harmony Peach, University of Windsor

Room 1

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

11:00 AM

Presumptions, burdens of proof, and explanations

Petar Bodlović, Faculty of Philosophy (Department of Theoretical Philosophy), University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Room 3

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Metalinguistic disagreements, underdetermination and the straw man fallacy: toward meaning argumentativism

Marcin Lewinski, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Room 2

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Where do you place your argument?

Christina Pontoppidan, University of Southern Denmark

Room 1

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

11:01 AM

Commentary on Petar Bodlović: "Presumptions, burdens of proof, and explanations"

David Godden, Philosophy, Michigan State University

Room 3

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

Commentary on: Christina Pontoppidan’s “Where Do You Place Your Argument? The Toulmin Model Revisited and Revised from a Rhetorical Perspective”

Manfred E. Kraus, University of Tübingen

Room 1

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

2:00 PM

Recovery and Reconstruction of Principles of Academic Debate as Dialectical Model: An Outline of a Procedural Model of Argumentative Rationality

Curtis Scott Jacobs, University of Illinois

Room 2

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

2:01 PM

A Commentary on TRACY BOWELL’S Whataboutisms, Arguments and Argumentative Harm

Mark Battersby, Critical Inquiry Group

Room 1

2:01 PM - 3:00 PM