Location
Room 3
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
accommodator, avoider, argument, collaborator, competitor, compromiser, conflict resolution, critical-logical perspective, mediation, resolution
Start Date
4-6-2020 10:00 AM
End Date
4-6-2020 11:00 AM
Abstract
Is reaching an agreement a product of strong arguing-making and argument-having? Mediators are trained to be neutral facilitators with a range of diverse strategies for resolving disagreements. In spite of this, parties in conflict can derail a mediator’s trajectory in helping all involved by i) understand different positions and especially ii) develop resolutions. Borrowing from the literature of conflict resolution this paper questions the efficacy of critical-logical normative argumentation models.
Reader's Reactions
Sally Jackson, Commentary on: Linda Carozza’s “Diversity, conflict, and (dis)agreement” (June 2020)
Included in
Diversity, conflict resolution, and (dis)agreement
Room 3
Is reaching an agreement a product of strong arguing-making and argument-having? Mediators are trained to be neutral facilitators with a range of diverse strategies for resolving disagreements. In spite of this, parties in conflict can derail a mediator’s trajectory in helping all involved by i) understand different positions and especially ii) develop resolutions. Borrowing from the literature of conflict resolution this paper questions the efficacy of critical-logical normative argumentation models.
