2020 | ||
Wednesday, June 3rd | ||
---|---|---|
8:00 AM |
Why did you really do it? Examining the distinction between kinds of reasons José Ángel Gascón, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción Room 1 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:00 AM |
Harmony in diversity. On the (possible) existence of ‘the Canadian school of argumentation’ Federico Puppo, University of Trento Room 2 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:00 AM |
Acquisition of Knowledge Through Narrative in Argumentative Processes Guillermo Sierra-Catalán, University of Granada Room 3 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:01 AM |
Canadian Infrastructure for a “Canadian school” of Informal Logic and Argumentation Takuzo Konishi, Showa Women's University Room 2 8:01 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:01 AM |
Marcin Koszowy, Warsaw University of Technology Room 1 8:01 AM - 9:01 AM |
|
8:01 AM |
Commentary on Guillermo Sierra Catalán’s “Fictional Claims” Stephen Pender, University of Windsor Room 3 8:01 AM - 8:01 AM |
|
9:00 AM |
Negotiation as a disagreement management tool Diego Castro, University of Groningen Room 2 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:00 AM |
Deliberation and Collective Identity Formation Hubert Marraud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Room 3 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:00 AM |
Getting Down in the MUDs: A Ludological Perspective on Arguers Michael A. Yong-Set, University of Windsor Room 1 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:01 AM |
Commentary on Michael Yong-Set, “Getting Down in the MUDs: A Ludological Perspective on Arguers” John Licato, University of South Florida Room 1 9:01 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:01 AM |
Commentary on Castro, “Negotiation as a disagreement management tool” Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Room 2 9:01 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:01 AM |
Comment on Hubert Marraud’s “Deliberation And Collective Identity Formation” Jeff Noonan, University of Windsor Room 3 9:01 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:02 AM |
Reply to commentary on “Deliberation ad Collective Identity Formation” Hubert Marraud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Room 3 9:02 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
10:00 AM |
The incommensurability of values problem Julder Gómez, Eafit University Room 1 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:00 AM |
Deep disagreement as intellectual colonialism David Hitchcock, McMaster University Room 2 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:00 AM |
Confidence in Arguments in Dialogues for Practical Reasoning Waleed Mebane, University of Windsor Room 3 10:00 AM - 11:11 AM |
|
10:01 AM |
Commentary on Waleed Mebane’s “Confidence in Arguments in Dialogues for Practical Reasoning” Marcin Lewinski, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Room 3 10:01 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:01 AM |
Commentary in David Hitchcock’s, “Deep disagreement as intellectual colonialism” Matthew W. McKeon, Michigan State University Room 2 10:01 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:01 AM |
Commentary on: Julder Gómez, “The incommensurability of values problem” Alice Toniolo, University of St Andrews Room 1 10:01 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
11:00 AM |
The Persuasive Force of the Ad Baculum John P. Casey, Northeastern Illinois University Room 3 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:00 AM |
A Theory of Philosophical Arguments Christoph Lumer, University of Siena Room 2 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:00 AM |
Multimodal arguments in the mainstream press: Illustrating portrayals of migration Dimitris Serafis, USI - Università della Svizzera italiana Room 1 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:01 AM |
Commentary on Lumer, "A Theory of Philosophical Arguments" Patrick Bondy, Wichita State University Room 2 11:01 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:01 AM |
Commentary on Serafis et al.’s “Finding the Multi- in the Mode” Justin Eckstein, Pacific Lutheran University Room 1 11:01 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:01 AM |
Commentary on “The Persuasive Force of the Ad Baculum” by John Patrick Casey Thierry Herman, University of Lausanne and Neuchatel Room 3 11:01 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
2:00 PM |
Halting retreats to metadialogues Beth Innocenti, University of Kansas Main Campus Room 3 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:00 PM |
Institutional and Institutionalized Fallacies: Diversifying Pragma-Dialectical Fallacy Judgments Menno H. Reijven, University of Massachusetts Amherst Room 1 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:00 PM |
Principle of Charity as a Moral Requirement in Non-Institutionalized Argumentation Katharina Stevens, University of Lethbridge Room 2 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:01 PM |
Susan L. Kline, Ohio State University - Main Campus Room 3 2:01 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:01 PM |
Commentary: Notes on Katharina Stevens essay "Charity for Moral Reasons" Maureen Linker, University of Michigan Room 2 2:01 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:01 PM |
Institutionalized argumentative reasonableness - Commentary on Reijven Jean H.M. Wagemans, University of Amsterdam Room 1 2:01 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
3:00 PM |
Epistemic Success and Skeptical Norms in Argument Lucy Alsip Vollbrecht, Vanderbilt University Room 1 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM |
|
3:00 PM |
Developing Critical Thinking with Rhetorical Pedagogy Elizabeth Ismail, University of Windsor Room 3 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM |
|
3:00 PM |
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue Kathryn Phillips, University of Rochester 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM |
|
3:01 PM |
Comments on Developing Critical Thinking with Rhetorical Pedagogy by Elizabeth Ismail Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University Room 3 3:01 PM - 4:00 PM |
|
3:01 PM |
Commentary on Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue Tracy A. Bowell, University of Waikato Room 2 3:01 PM - 4:00 PM |
|
3:01 PM |
Commentary on Vollbrecht's "Epistemic success and skeptical norms in argumentation" Daniel H. Cohen, Colby College Room 1 3:01 PM - 4:00 PM |