Wednesday

Subscribe to RSS Feed

2020
Wednesday, June 3rd
8:00 AM

Why did you really do it? Examining the distinction between kinds of reasons

José Ángel Gascón, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción

Room 1

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

Harmony in diversity. On the (possible) existence of ‘the Canadian school of argumentation’

Federico Puppo, University of Trento

Room 2

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

Acquisition of Knowledge Through Narrative in Argumentative Processes

Guillermo Sierra-Catalán, University of Granada

Room 3

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

8:01 AM

Commentary: Canadian infrastructure for a ‘Canadian’ ‘school’ of informal logic and argumentation

Takuzo Konishi, Showa Women's University

Room 2

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

Commentary: In search for a balance between experimental research and the theory of reasoning: Commentary on Jose Ángel Gascón’s ‘Why did you really do it? Examining the distinction between kinds of reasons’

Marcin Koszowy, Warsaw University of Technology

Room 1

8:01 AM - 9:01 AM

Commentary: Fictional Claims

Stephen Pender, University of Windsor

Room 3

8:01 AM - 8:01 AM

9:00 AM

Negotiation as a disagreement management tool

Diego Castro, University of Groningen

Room 2

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Deliberation and Collective Identity Formation

Hubert Marraud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Room 3

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Getting Down in the MUDs: A Ludological Perspective on Arguers

Michael A. Yong-Set, University of Windsor

Room 1

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

9:01 AM

Commentary on Michael Yong-Set, “Getting Down in the MUDs: A Ludological Perspective on Arguers”

John Licato, University of South Florida

Room 1

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

Commentary on Michael Yong-Set, “Getting Down in the MUDs: A Ludological Perspective on Arguers” (Video)

John Licato, University of South Florida

Room 1

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

Commentary on Castro, “Negotiation as a disagreement management tool”

Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Room 2

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

10:00 AM

The incommensurability of values problem

Julder Gómez, Eafit University

Room 1

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Deep disagreement as intellectual colonialism

David Hitchcock, McMaster University

Room 2

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Deep disagreement as intellectual colonialism

David Hitchcock, McMaster University

Room 2

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Confidence in Arguments in Dialogues for Practical Reasoning

Waleed Mebane, University of Windsor

Room 3

10:00 AM - 11:11 AM

10:01 AM

Commentary on Waleed Mebane’s “Confidence in Arguments in Dialogues for Practical Reasoning”

Marcin Lewinski, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Room 3

10:01 AM - 11:00 AM

Commentary in David Hitchcock’s, “Deep disagreement as intellectual colonialism”

Matthew W. McKeon, Michigan State University

Room 2

10:01 AM - 11:00 AM

Commentary in David Hitchcock’s, “Deep disagreement as intellectual colonialism”

Matthew W. McKeon, Michigan State University

Room 2

10:01 AM - 11:00 AM

Commentary on: Julder Gómez, “The incommensurability of values problem”

Alice Toniolo, University of St Andrews

Room 1

10:01 AM - 11:00 AM

11:00 AM

The Persuasive Force of the Ad Baculum

John P. Casey, Northeastern Illinois University

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

A Theory of Philosophical Arguments

Christoph Lumer, University of Siena

Room 2

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Multimodal arguments in the mainstream press: Illustrating portrayals of migration

Dimitris Serafis, USI - Università della Svizzera italiana
Sara Greco, USI - Università della Svizzera italiana
Chiara Pollaroli, USI - Università della Svizzera italiana
Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria, USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

Room 1

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

11:01 AM

Commentary on Lumer, "A Theory of Philosophical Arguments"

Patrick Bondy, Wichita State University

Room 2

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

Response Finding the Multi-in the Mode

Justin Eckstein, Pacific Lutheran University

Room 1

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

Commentary on “The Persuasive Force of the Ad Baculum” by John Patrick Casey

Thierry Herman, University of Lausanne and Neuchatel

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

2:00 PM

Halting retreats to metadialogues

Beth Innocenti, University of Kansas Main Campus

Room 3

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Institutional and Institutionalized Fallacies: Diversifying Pragma-Dialectical Fallacy Judgments

Menno H. Reijven, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Room 1

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Principle of Charity as a Moral Requirement in Non-Institutionalized Argumentation

Katharina Stevens, University of Lethbridge

Room 2

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

2:01 PM

Commentary: Notes on Katharina Stevens essay "Charity for Moral Reasons"

Maureen Linker, University of Michigan

Room 2

2:01 PM - 3:00 PM

Institutionalized argumentative reasonableness - Commentary on Reijven

Jean H.M. Wagemans, University of Amsterdam

Room 1

2:01 PM - 3:00 PM

3:00 PM

Epistemic Success and Skeptical Norms in Argument

Lucy Alsip Vollbrecht, Vanderbilt University

Room 1

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Developing Critical Thinking with Rhetorical Pedagogy

Elizabeth Ismail, University of Windsor

Room 3

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue

Kathryn Phillips, University of Rochester

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

3:01 PM

Comments on Developing Critical Thinking with Rhetorical Pedagogy by Elizabeth Ismail

Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University

Room 3

3:01 PM - 4:00 PM

Commentary on Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue

Tracy A. Bowell, University of Waikato

Room 2

3:01 PM - 4:00 PM

Commentary on Vollbrecht's "Epistemic success and skeptical norms in argumentation"

Daniel H. Cohen, Colby College

Room 1

3:01 PM - 4:00 PM