Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-555X
Location
Room 1
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
conductive argument, deliberation, incommensurability between values, practical reasoning, reasonable decisions
Start Date
3-6-2020 10:00 AM
End Date
3-6-2020 11:00 AM
Abstract
How to make a reasonable decision in a pluralistic community when two of their highest values (CP and CN) are incommensurable, one of them (CP) is used as a premise in favor of a proposal (C), and the other one (CN) is used as a premise against the very same proposal? After considering previous answers to similar questions, I suggest establishing new hierarchies of values from the point of view of their conditions of possibility.
Reader's Reactions
Alice Toniolo, Commentary on: Julder Gómez, “The incommensurability of values problem” (June 2020)
Included in
The incommensurability of values problem
Room 1
How to make a reasonable decision in a pluralistic community when two of their highest values (CP and CN) are incommensurable, one of them (CP) is used as a premise in favor of a proposal (C), and the other one (CN) is used as a premise against the very same proposal? After considering previous answers to similar questions, I suggest establishing new hierarchies of values from the point of view of their conditions of possibility.
