Commentary on Powers

Jonathan Adler

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Pinto

Derek Allen

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Garrett

Richard B. Angell

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Boulos

Peter D. Asquith

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Theory Dependence, Context Dependence, Tacit Knowledge, and Informal Logic

Peter D. Asquith, Michigan State University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Bias, Bayes, and Group Psychology

Guillermo Barron, Red Deer College

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

‘Argument’ and ‘Logic’ in Logic Textbooks

J Anthony Blair, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Gratton

Charles Blatz

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Wein

Pierre J. Boulos

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Newtonian Revolution as a revolution in scientific reasoning

Pierre J. Boulos, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Varieties of Argument in Indian Thought

Richard S G Brown, Brock University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

How Political Cults Warp Argumentation: Who’s Lying?

Beth Browning Jacobs, University of Illinois at Chicago

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Agreement and Argumentation

Chris Campolo, Hendrix College

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Place of Impiety in Civic Argument

Maurice Charland, Concordia University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Uses of Argument: A Contextual Application

Patrick Clauss, Butler University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Arguing With God

Daniel H. Cohen, Colby College

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Schwed

Daniel H. Cohen

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Arts Controversies and the Problem of the Public Sphere

Peter Cramer, Carnegie Mellon University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Browning Jacobs

Stanley B. Cunningham

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Philosophizing Propaganda

Stanley B. Cunningham, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Analogy and narrative: caring about the forgone and repressed

Jackie Davies, Queen's University at Kingston

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Qualified Reasoning Approaching Deductive Validity

Robert H. Ennis

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The role of Arguments from Consequences in Practical Argumentation

Eveline T. Feteris, Univ. of Amsterdam

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Blair

Maurice Finocchiaro

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Novak

Maurice Finocchiaro

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Can Interpretations Ever Be Acceptable Basic Premises?

James B. Freeman, Hunter College of The City Univ of New York

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Los

James B. Freeman

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Reducing Conflict Between Ordinary People by Third Party Interventions

Richard Friemann, York University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Clauss

Richard Fulkerson

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Problems in Systematic Analysis of “Full-Length” Arguments, and Some Possible Contributions from Contemporary Composition Theory

Richard Fulkerson, Texas A&M University-Commerce

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Brown

Mary M. Garrett

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Language and Logic in China: A Guide for Argumentation Scholars

Mary M. Garrett, Wayne State University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Yanal

Richard Gaskins

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Campolo

Michael A. Gilbert

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Ideal Argumentation

Michael A. Gilbert, York University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

On the Relation of Argumentation and Inference

David M. Godden, McMaster University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Konishi

Jean Goodwin

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

One Question, Two Answers

Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Differences between Opinion and Argumentation

Jim Gough, Red Deer College,

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Collective Responsibility and the Fallacies of Composition and Division

Trudy Govier

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Asquith

Trudy Govier

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Fulkerson

Claude Gratton

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Common pedagogical weaknesses in critical thinking textbooks and courses

Claude Gratton, University of Nevada Las Vegas

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

An Argument Evaluation Procedure Incorporating Arguer Credibility

Wayne Grennan, St. Mary's University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Hoaglund

Wayne Grennan

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Reed & Walton

Leo Groarke

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Slade

Leo Groarke

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Pure and Applied Theories of Argument: Where Does Philosophy Belong Within Argumentation Theory?

Leo Groarke, Wilfrid Laurier University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Anecdotal Reasoning

Louis F. Groarke, York University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Gough

Louis F. Groarke

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Plumer & Olson

Marcello Guarini

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

On the Limits of the Woods-Hudak Reconstruction of Analogical Argument

Marcello Guarini, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Krabbe

Hans V. Hansen

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Barron

David Hitchcock

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Sampling scholarly arguments: a test of a theory of good inference

David Hitchcock, McMaster University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues

David Hitchcock, McMaster University
Peter Mcburney
Simon Parsons

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Implicit Premises

John Hoaglund, Christopher Newport University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Presumptions In Roman Legal Argumentation

Hanns Hohmann, San Jose State University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Gilbert

Peter Houtlosser

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Kauffeld

Ralph H. Johnson

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

More on Arguers and Their Dialectical Obligations

Ralph H. Johnson, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Groarke

Fred J. Kauffeld

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Grice without the Cooperative Principle

Fred J. Kauffeld, Edgewood College

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

A Generalized Stasis Theory and Arguers' Dialectical Obligations

Takuzo Konishi, Tokai University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric

Erik C W Krabbe, Groningen University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on McInnis

Michael Leff

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Culturally Inherited Cognitive Activity: Implications for the Rhetoric of Science

Joseph Little

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Attention to Kinds of Claims in Argument Evaluation

Paul Los, University of Toronto

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Govier

Jacqueline Macgregor Davies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Cunningham

Randal Marlin

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Verheij

Peter Mcburney

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

EEbrius: The Topos of Drunkenness in Cicero’s Speeches

Crista McInnis

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Mifsud

Raymie McKerrow
Jeffrey St John

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Plug

Raymie McKerrow
Jeffrey St John

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Tiner

Vance Mendenhall

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

When It's Not Just Rhetoric

Vance Mendenhall, University of Ottawa

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge

Mari Lee Mifsud, University of Richmond

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Cramer

Jeff Noonan

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Friemann

Gerald Nosich

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Abduction and Aristotle's Library

Joseph A. Novak, University of Waterloo

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Cohen

Joseph A. Novak

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on van rees

Daniel O'Keefe

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Divided by Enlightenment: Habermas, Foucault and the Place of Rhetoric

Kendall R. Phillips, Syracuse University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Godden

Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Truth and Premiss Adequacy

Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Mendenhall

Christian Plantin

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Reconstructing the weight of legal arguments

H José Plug, Univ. of Amsterdam

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?

Gilbert Plumer, Law School Admission Council
Ken Olson, Law School Admission Council

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on van Laar

Lawrence H. Powers

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Statistical Syllogistic, Part 1

Lawrence H. Powers

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Grennan

Chris Reed

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Applications of Argumentation Schemes

Chris Reed, University of Dundee
Doug Walton, University of Winnipeg

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Phillips

William Rehg

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

In Praise of Eristics

Pedro Reygadas, Col. Santa María La Ribera

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Computer Decision-Support Systems for Public Argumentation: Criteria for Assessment

Willaim Rheg, Saint Louis University
Peter Mcburney
Simon Parsons

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Hitchcock, Mcburney & Parsons

Walid Saba

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Turner

Menashe Schwed

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Descriptive theories of argumentation as part of Quine’s project of “naturalized” epistemology

Menashe Schwed, Ashkelon Regional College

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Coherence in organisational argumentation

John A A Sillince, University of London

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Davies

Christina Slade

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Seeing reasons

Christina Slade, University Sydney

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Goodwin

Christopher W. Tindale

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Teaching Freshmen to Reason—And Live—Through Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion

Elza C. Tiner, Lynchburg College

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

You Should Have Arguments For Your Views?

Dale Turner, California State Polytechnic

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Yanoshevsky

A van den Hoven

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Johnson

Frans H. van Eemeren

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof

Frans H. van Eemeren, Univ. of Amsterdam
Peter Houtlosser, Univ. of Amsterdam

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Ambiguity in a dialectical perspective

Jan Albert van Laar, Groningen University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentative functions of dissociation in every-day discussions

M Agnes van Rees, Univ. of Amsterdam

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Sillince

M Agnes van Rees

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What We Reconstruct in Enthymeme Reconstruction: A Linguistiic-Argumentative Approach

Lev G. Vassiliev

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme

Bart Verheij, Universiteit Maastricht

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Decision Theory as a primary part of Critical Thinking Courses

Sheldon Wein, St. Mary's University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Little

Mark L. Weinstein

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Reygadas

Mark L. Weinstein

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on van Eemeren & Houtlosser

Joseph Wenzel

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Guarini

John Woods

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Ennis

Robert J. Yanal

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Incorrect Judicial Decisions

Robert J. Yanal, Wayne State University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Textual Heterogeneity as an Argumentative Strategy: The Case of Robbe-Grillet’s

Galia Yanoshevsky, Tel-Aviv University

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Hohmann

George W. Ziegelmuller

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM