Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Restricted Access
Start Date
6-6-2007 9:00 AM
End Date
9-6-2007 5:00 PM
Abstract
Argumentation scholars' interest in the work of Charles Sanders Peirce has been almost exclusively confined to his conception of abduction, and he is not currently regarded as a key figure for development of argumentation. This paper examines his notion of sign and semiotics and their relation to inference and argument, and argues that semiosis and sign, along with abduction, should be the focus for argumentation scholars' research on Peirce.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Michael H G Hoffmann, Commentary on Takuzo
Reader's Reactions
Michael H G Hoffmann, Commentary on Takuzo (June 2007)
Included in
Peircean Semiosis/Sign and their Contribution to Argumentation
University of Windsor
Argumentation scholars' interest in the work of Charles Sanders Peirce has been almost exclusively confined to his conception of abduction, and he is not currently regarded as a key figure for development of argumentation. This paper examines his notion of sign and semiotics and their relation to inference and argument, and argues that semiosis and sign, along with abduction, should be the focus for argumentation scholars' research on Peirce.
