Papers and Commentaries

Papers and commentaries from the 9th OSSA conference, 2011. Commentaries are included with papers in a single file.

Schedule
Wednesday, May 18th
Subscribe to RSS Feed
2011
9:00 AM	The dialectical tier of mathematical proof Andrew Aberdein, Florida Institute of Technology Anton Colijn University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	A gendered analysis of the role of authority in argumentation Khameiel Al Tamimi, York University John E. Fields University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Tu quoque arguments, subjunctive inconsistency, and questions of relevance Colin Anderson, Hiram College Scott F. Aikin, Vanderbilt University John Casey, Northeastern Illinois University Christoph Lumer University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Reason in the balance: Teaching critical thinking as dialectical Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University Mark Battersby, Capilano University Patrick Clauss University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Fallacy identification in a dialectical approach to teaching critical thinking Mark Battersby, Capilano University Sharon Bailin Jan Albert van Laar University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Defining functions of Danish political commentary Mette Bengtsson, University of Copenhagen Mary L. Kahl University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	A unitary schema for arguments by analogy Lilian Bermejo-Luque, CCHS-CSIC George Boger University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	A critical examination and development of Wellman’s theory of conductive argument J Blair, University of Windsor Dale Hample University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Community, argumentation, and the legitimacy of reasons for action Charles Blatz, University of Toledo Mano Daniel University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Shifting focus from the universal audience to the common good George Boger, Canisius College Rongdong Jin University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Against epistemic circularity Patrick Bondy, McMaster University Kevin Delaplante University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	A very different kind of rule: Credal rules, argumentation and community James Bradley, Memorial University of Newfoundland Peter Loptson University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	The formal failure and social success of logic William Brooke, University of the Fraser Valley Andrew Aberdein University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Structure of persuasive communication and elaboration likelihood model Katarzyna Budzynska, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Harry Weger Jr University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	The evaluation of emotional arguments: a test run Linda Carozza, York University Fabrizio Macagno University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Authority arguments in academic contexts in social studies and humanities Begona Carrascal, University of the Basque Countr Catherine E. Hundleby University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	A test of the argument engagement model in Romania Ioana Cionea, University of Maryland Dale Hample, University of Maryland Fabio Paglieri, Goal-Oriented Agents Laboratory Lilian Bermejo-Luque University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Is data the plural of anecdote? Inductive arguments in composition Patrick Clauss, University of Notre Dame Laura Pinto University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Academic arguments Daniel Cohen, Colby College George Thomas Goodnight University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	An informal look at the non-apology Mano Daniel, Douglas College Jeff Noonan University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	‘Cognitive systemic dichotomization’ in public argumentation and controversies Marcelo Dascal, Tel Aviv University Amnon Knoll, Tel Aviv University Daniel Cohen University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Should we agree to disagree? Pragmatism and peer disagreement Susan Dieleman, York University Steven W. Visual analogies and arguments University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Visual analogies and arguments Ian Dove Marcello Guarini University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	An inferential community: Poincaré’s mathematicians Michel Dufour, Sorbonne Nouvelle John Woods University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	The rhetoric of store-window mannequins Emma Engdahl, Orebro University Marie Gelang, Orebro University Kurt Zemlicka University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Defending sole singular causal claims Robert Ennis, University of Illinois Maurice A. Finocchiaro University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Credibility and commitment in the making of truly astonishing first-person reports John E. Fields, Edgewood College Gilbert Plumer University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Deep disagreements: A meta-argumentation approach Maurice Finocchiaro, University of Nevada, Las Vegas David M. Godden University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Issues in conductive argument weight Thomas Fischer, University of Houston Downtown Rongdong Jin University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches David Godden, Old Dominion University Harvey Siegel University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	How many premises can an argument have? G C. Goddu, University of Richmond David Hitchcock University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Accounting for the force of the appeal to authority Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University Raymie McKerrow University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Conductive arguments and the ‘inference to the best explanation’ Dean Goorden, University of Windsor Thomas Fischer University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	More on counter-considerations Trudy Govier, University of Lethbridge Derek Allen University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Eating flowers, holding hands: Should critical thinking pedagogy ‘go wild’? Benjamin Hamby, McMaster University Ralph H. Johnson University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Convergent causal arguments in conversation Dale Hample, University of Maryland Katarzyna Budzynska University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Are there methods of informal logic? Hans V. Hansen, University of Windsor Daniel H. Cohen University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Should critical thinking courses include the critique of religious beliefs? Donald Hatcher, Baker University Mark Battersby University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Cognitive effects of argument visualization tools Michael Hoffmann, Georgia Institute of Technology Fabio Paglieri University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Correlation and causality Michael Hoppmann, Northeastern University Robert H. Ennis University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Androcentrism as a fallacy of argumentation Catherine Hundleby, University of Windsor Claudio Duran University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Arguing by apostrophizing Beth Innocenti, University of Kansas Manfred Kraus University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Deepening disagreement in engineering education Robert Irish, University of Toronto Brian Macpherson University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Rationality, reasonableness and informal logic: A case study of Chaim Perelman Rongdong Jin, East China Normal University Christopher W. Tindale University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	When is an exercise in logic also a logic game? David Kary, Law School Admission Council Sheldon Wein University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Strategies for strengthening presumptions and generating ethos by manifestly ensuring accountability Fred Kauffeld, Edgewood College Erik C W Krabbe University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Visual argumentation in an Al Gore keynote presentation on climate change Jens Kjeldsen, University of Bergen Michael K. Potter University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Cognitive communities and argument communities Manfred Kraus, University of Tübingen David Zarefsky University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Evidence-based practice and Toulmin Tone Kvernbekk, University of Oslo Robert C. Pinto University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Conflict and consultation: Strategic manoeuvring in response to an antibiotic request Nanon Labrie, Università della Svizzera italiana Douglas Walton, University of Windsor University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Monologue, dilogue or polylogue: Which model for public deliberation? Marcin Lewinski, Universidade Nova de Lisboa J Anthony Blair University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Argument schemes—an epistemological approach Christoph Lumer, University of Siena Ian J. Dove University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Implicatures and hierarchies of presumptions Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Frank Zenker University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Naturalistic methods, constitutive principles and Einstein’s elevator Geordie Mccomb, University of Toronto Pierre J. Boulos University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Strategic manoeuvring in simultaneous discussions Dima Mohammed, University of Amsterdam Robert C. Rowland University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Practical reasoning as creative social imagination Radu Neculau, University of Windsor James Bradley University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Wide reflective equilibrium and conductive argument Steven Patterson, Marygrove College Charles V. Blatz University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	High school philosophy teachers’ use of textbooks: Critical thinking or teaching to the text? Laura Pinto, Niagara University (Ontario Campus) Graham P. McDonough, University of Victoria Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Emotions and reasons Robert Pinto, University of Windsor University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Cognition and literary ethical criticism Gilbert Plumer, Law School Admission Council Louis Groarke University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	“Building the fact” in trial: a rhetorical account Federico Puppo, University of Trento University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Argumentation and design deliberation: a mutual relationship Chrysi Rapanta, Università della Svizzera italiana Carole Blair University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Moral disagreements and pernicious pragmatism: Pluralism, value argumentation, and the U.S. health care debate John Rief, University of Pittsburgh Matthew Paul Brigham, James Madison University Bill Balthrop University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Argumentation and emotional cognition in advertisements M Ripley, York University Maureen P. Gowing University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Deliberating collective action and identity: The dialectic of institutional and vernacular rhetoric in political debates on nytimes.com Rasmus Ronlev, University of Copenhagen University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Inference as growth: Peirce’s ecstatic logic of illation Philip Rose, University of Windsor John Woods University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	“Those states … will hardly adopt them”: On a fallacy in political discourse in the summer of 1789 Juhani Rudanko, University of Tampere Stephen Pender University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Evolution, cognition and argumentation Cristian Santibanez Yanez, University Diego Portales Michael A. Gilbert University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	The story behind the plot: About the propositionality of visually presented argumentation Paul van den Hoven, Utrecht University Michael H G Hoffman University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament Frans van Eemeren, ILIAS & University of Amsterdam Bart Garrsen Robert Thomas Craig University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	The burden of criticism Jan van Laar, University of Groningen Erik C.W. Krabbe Marcelo Dascal University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Choosing variants of pragmatic argumentation in anticipation of countermoves in health brochures Lotte van Poppel, University of Amsterdam Linda Carozza University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Ernest Sosa and virtuously begging the question Michael Walschots, University of Windsor Scott F. Aikin University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Modeling critical questions as additional premises Douglas Walton, University of Windsor Thomas F. Gordon, Fraunhofer FOKUS Scott F. Aikin University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Productive versus destructive cooperation Sheldon Wein, Saint Mary’s University Radu Neculau University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Semantic penumbra? Concept similarity in logic John Woods, University of British Columbia, King’s College, London Nicholas Griffin University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Whose Toulmin, and which logic? A response to van Benthem Yun Xie, Sun Yat-sen University Minghui Xiong, Institute of Logic and Cognition Hans V. Hansen University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Fallacies: do we “use” them or “commit” them? Or: is all our life just a collection of fallacies? Igor Zagar, Educational Research Institute Dima Mohammed University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
9:00 AM	Foundations for nothing and facts for free? Frank Zenker, Lund University, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies Fred Kauffeld University of Windsor 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

OSSA Conference Archive

Search

Browse

Author Corner

Links