Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
argument engagement, costs and benefits of arguing, arguing in Romania.
Start Date
18-5-2011 9:00 AM
End Date
21-5-2011 5:00 PM
Abstract
Hample, Paglieri, and Na’s (2010) model of argument engagement proposes that people en-gage in arguments when they perceive the benefits of arguing to be greater than the costs of doing so. This paper tests the model in Romania, a different culture than the one in which the model was developed, by using a 2 (other arguer: friend or romantic partner) x 2 (topic of argument: private or public issue) design.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Included in
A test of the argument engagement model in Romania
University of Windsor
Hample, Paglieri, and Na’s (2010) model of argument engagement proposes that people en-gage in arguments when they perceive the benefits of arguing to be greater than the costs of doing so. This paper tests the model in Romania, a different culture than the one in which the model was developed, by using a 2 (other arguer: friend or romantic partner) x 2 (topic of argument: private or public issue) design.
