"A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based" by Erica A. Geldart, Andrew F. Barnas et al.
 

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2022

Publication Title

Scientific Reports

Volume

12

Issue

1

Abstract

Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders.

DOI

10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7

E-ISSN

20452322

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

PubMed ID

36335150

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 12
    • Policy Citations: 1
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 42
  • Captures
    • Readers: 34
  • Social Media
    • Shares, Likes & Comments: 24
see details

Share

COinS