Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1984
Publication Title
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review
Volume
23
Issue
1
First Page
129
Last Page
134
Abstract
According to the standard account of Nicholas' views,his scepticism is constrained by his commitment to the law of non-contradiction as a basis for certain truth. Such an account fails to distinguish the (early and later) views found in the "Leters to Bernard" and the "Exigit Ordo" the latter clear rejects the law of non-contradiction and propounds a full fledged scepticism.
DOI
10.1017/S0012217300019181
Recommended Citation
Groarke, Leo. (1984). On Nicholas of Autrecourt and the Law of Non-Contradiction. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 23 (1), 129-134.
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/philosophypub/27
Comments
This article was first published in Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review. It is available here. Copyright (2012) Cambridge University Press.