Should I confront him? men's reactions to hypothetical confrontations of peer sexual harassment
Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3463-5704
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Sex Roles
Publication Date
5-15-2009
Volume
61
Issue
5-6
First Page
399
Last Page
415
Keywords
Confrontation, Peer harassment, Reactions, Sexual harassment
DOI
10.1007/s11199-009-9638-0
Abstract
This study investigated how men react to a hypothetical confrontation by a woman of a male sexual harasser. Participants were 250 male undergraduates from a Canadian university who read scenarios depicting sexual harassment that varied by type of harassment and style of confrontation. Findings suggest that men have more negative feelings and opinions of a female confronter, and would engage in more negative verbal behaviour if confronted about subtle versus overt harassment. Contrary to prediction, assertive/hostile confrontation styles were related to only limited negative reactions. Although this study found that men's reported reactions were not markedly negative, we discuss the importance of these results for women in understanding what factors may increase the chance that men will react negatively. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009.
Recommended Citation
Saunders, Kristin A. and Senn, Charlene Y.. (2009). Should I confront him? men's reactions to hypothetical confrontations of peer sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 61 (5-6), 399-415.
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/psychologypub/94