Location

University of Windsor

Document Type

Restricted Access

Start Date

6-6-2007 9:00 AM

End Date

9-6-2007 5:00 PM

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a framework for evaluating arguments in multicultural argumentative dialogues. In these dialogues there is not a common knowledge to evaluate arguments because their participants are members of different ethnical and cultural groups. To solve this problem this paper will propose a multicultural theory of argumentation that will criticize the Blair-Johnson’s claim (2006) that one of the causes of the fallacies is the ethnocentrism.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Response to Submission

Mark Battersby, Commentary on Marrero Avendano

Reader's Reactions

Mark Battersby, Commentary on Marrero Avendano (June 2007)

Share

COinS
 
Jun 6th, 9:00 AM Jun 9th, 5:00 PM

How to Evaluate Arguments in Multicultural Argumentative Dialogues?

University of Windsor

The aim of this paper is to present a framework for evaluating arguments in multicultural argumentative dialogues. In these dialogues there is not a common knowledge to evaluate arguments because their participants are members of different ethnical and cultural groups. To solve this problem this paper will propose a multicultural theory of argumentation that will criticize the Blair-Johnson’s claim (2006) that one of the causes of the fallacies is the ethnocentrism.