Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Restricted Access
Start Date
6-6-2007 9:00 AM
End Date
9-6-2007 5:00 PM
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present a framework for evaluating arguments in multicultural argumentative dialogues. In these dialogues there is not a common knowledge to evaluate arguments because their participants are members of different ethnical and cultural groups. To solve this problem this paper will propose a multicultural theory of argumentation that will criticize the Blair-Johnson’s claim (2006) that one of the causes of the fallacies is the ethnocentrism.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Mark Battersby, Commentary on Marrero Avendano
Reader's Reactions
Mark Battersby, Commentary on Marrero Avendano (June 2007)
Included in
How to Evaluate Arguments in Multicultural Argumentative Dialogues?
University of Windsor
The aim of this paper is to present a framework for evaluating arguments in multicultural argumentative dialogues. In these dialogues there is not a common knowledge to evaluate arguments because their participants are members of different ethnical and cultural groups. To solve this problem this paper will propose a multicultural theory of argumentation that will criticize the Blair-Johnson’s claim (2006) that one of the causes of the fallacies is the ethnocentrism.
