“Those states … will hardly adopt them”: On a fallacy in political discourse in the summer of 1789
Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
ad socordiam, deceptive communication, James Madison, second order intention
Start Date
18-5-2011 9:00 AM
End Date
21-5-2011 5:00 PM
Abstract
A type of ad socordiam is identified in its context, with data from debates on the Bill of Rights in 1789. The fallacy involves a hidden intention as a salient feature. The study examines the ques-tion of how inferences can be made about hidden intentions. Further, it examines the relation of the fallacy identified to another type of ad socordiam.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
“Those states … will hardly adopt them”: On a fallacy in political discourse in the summer of 1789
University of Windsor
A type of ad socordiam is identified in its context, with data from debates on the Bill of Rights in 1789. The fallacy involves a hidden intention as a salient feature. The study examines the ques-tion of how inferences can be made about hidden intentions. Further, it examines the relation of the fallacy identified to another type of ad socordiam.