Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
analogies, analogical argumentation, argument analysis, argument evaluation, deductive analogical argumentation, inductive analogical argumentation, linguistic-pragmatic normative models of argumentation, Toulmin’s model of argument.
Start Date
18-5-2011 9:00 AM
End Date
21-5-2011 5:00 PM
Abstract
Following a Toulmian account of argument analysis and evaluation, I offer a unitary schema for, so called, deductive and inductive types of analogical arguments. This schema is able to explain why certain analogical arguments can be said to be deductive, and yet, also defeasible.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Included in
A unitary schema for arguments by analogy
University of Windsor
Following a Toulmian account of argument analysis and evaluation, I offer a unitary schema for, so called, deductive and inductive types of analogical arguments. This schema is able to explain why certain analogical arguments can be said to be deductive, and yet, also defeasible.
