Author ORCID Identifier
Location
Room 1
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
Context, discourse analysis, evidence, narrative argument, narrative positioning, story credibility, story plausibility
Start Date
4-6-2020 9:00 AM
End Date
4-6-2020 10:00 AM
Abstract
Building on a view of both narration and argumentation as dynamic concepts, the aim of this paper is to argue that story credibility remains a core issue in the debate on the argumentative quality of narratives, yet one that the dynamic perspective has not interrogated in sufficient detail. To illustrate, I will draw on empirical examples from research interviews with adult migrants to Norway on their learning and using Norwegian as a second language.
Reader's Reactions
Paula Olmos, Commentary on Jarmila Bubikova-Moan’s “Unpacking the narrative-argumentative conundrum: story credibility revisited” (June 2020)
Included in
Unpacking the narrative-argumentative conundrum: story credibility revisited
Room 1
Building on a view of both narration and argumentation as dynamic concepts, the aim of this paper is to argue that story credibility remains a core issue in the debate on the argumentative quality of narratives, yet one that the dynamic perspective has not interrogated in sufficient detail. To illustrate, I will draw on empirical examples from research interviews with adult migrants to Norway on their learning and using Norwegian as a second language.
