Location

Room 1

Document Type

Paper

Keywords

argumentation in discourse, Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT), headlines, inference, Italian press, Key Component (KC) table, multimodality, news articles, press photographs, refugee crisis

Start Date

3-6-2020 11:00 AM

End Date

3-6-2020 12:00 PM

Abstract

This paper sketches a methodological integration of tools from multimodal discourse analysis and argumentation in order to unveil opaque argumentative inferences emerging in multimodal configurations (i.e., headlines and press photos) of seemingly non-argumentative genres such as news articles. We offer illustrative examples from the Italian mainstream press in the context of the so-called European ‘refugee crisis.’ Overall, our methodologically oriented proposal aims to deepen the debate in the area of multimodal argumentation. To that end, we sketch a dialogue with other perspectives that specifically study argumentative inference in multimodal configurations. We contend that this approach enables a better examination of the argumentative potential that is implicitly sustained in multimodal configurations of news articles.

Reader's Reactions

Justin Eckstein, Commentary on Serafis et al.’s “Finding the Multi- in the Mode” (June 2020)

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS
 
Jun 3rd, 11:00 AM Jun 3rd, 12:00 PM

Multimodal arguments in the mainstream press: Illustrating portrayals of migration

Room 1

This paper sketches a methodological integration of tools from multimodal discourse analysis and argumentation in order to unveil opaque argumentative inferences emerging in multimodal configurations (i.e., headlines and press photos) of seemingly non-argumentative genres such as news articles. We offer illustrative examples from the Italian mainstream press in the context of the so-called European ‘refugee crisis.’ Overall, our methodologically oriented proposal aims to deepen the debate in the area of multimodal argumentation. To that end, we sketch a dialogue with other perspectives that specifically study argumentative inference in multimodal configurations. We contend that this approach enables a better examination of the argumentative potential that is implicitly sustained in multimodal configurations of news articles.