Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Start Date
3-6-2009 9:00 AM
End Date
6-6-2009 5:00 PM
Abstract
Many argumentation theorists have adopted the view that argumentation may be approached from three different perspectives: the logical, the dialectical and the rhetorical—which I refer to as the Triumvirate.). According to Wenzel (1990), the conceptual foundation for this Triumvirate is the distinction between argumentation as product, as process and as procedure (the Tripartite Distinction.). In this paper, I want to raise questions about the Triumvirate View and the Tripartite Distinction on which it is based.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Raymie E. Mckerrow, Commentary on Johnson
Reader's Reactions
Raymie E. Mckerrow, Commentary on Johnson (June 2009)
Included in
Revisiting the Logical/Dialectical/Rhetorical Triumvirate
University of Windsor
Many argumentation theorists have adopted the view that argumentation may be approached from three different perspectives: the logical, the dialectical and the rhetorical—which I refer to as the Triumvirate.). According to Wenzel (1990), the conceptual foundation for this Triumvirate is the distinction between argumentation as product, as process and as procedure (the Tripartite Distinction.). In this paper, I want to raise questions about the Triumvirate View and the Tripartite Distinction on which it is based.
