Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Start Date
3-6-2009 9:00 AM
End Date
6-6-2009 5:00 PM
Abstract
This paper attempts to trace a series of theoretical and political challenges between the early 1970s and the mid-1980s that advocates of Canadian informal logic movement had to overcome for making informal logic as a legitimate philosophical inquiry. Based on a historical narrative that reveals a trajectory of the development of informal logic using oral history interviews and archival research, this paper offers proposals for a research agenda for history of argumentation/informal logic.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
J Anthony Blair, Commentary on Konishi
Reader's Reactions
J Anthony Blair, Commentary on Konishi (June 2009)
Included in
Toward a History of Argumentation: Canadian informal logic
University of Windsor
This paper attempts to trace a series of theoretical and political challenges between the early 1970s and the mid-1980s that advocates of Canadian informal logic movement had to overcome for making informal logic as a legitimate philosophical inquiry. Based on a historical narrative that reveals a trajectory of the development of informal logic using oral history interviews and archival research, this paper offers proposals for a research agenda for history of argumentation/informal logic.
