Computer-supported online public deliberation

Submitter and Co-author information

Waleed H. Mebane, University of WindsorFollow

Standing

Graduate (PhD)

Type of Proposal

Oral Research Presentation

Software prototype, visually and orally presented

Faculty

Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences

Faculty Sponsor

Hans Hansen

Proposal

It is important in democracies that public opinion be formed based on fact and taking into consideration perspectives, preferences, and values of others.

The proposed online discussion forum allows participants to propose policy issues for consideration. Then the participants may exchange pro and con arguments (and other kinds of considerations) in support of or opposed to policy positions. Betting markets are incorporated in a novel way, one or more markets for each argument. Participants attempt to predict the weight of evidence that will eventually be found to support each argument by making bets with play money. The system supports participants in specifying the logical relationships between their arguments, and it uses the logical relationships and the current price together with probability to infer the best estimate of the participants’ collective rational judgement. The market allows participants to regulate the discussion themselves, without moderators. They have an incentive to contribute arguments that will withstand counter-argument and be thought by others to be weighty considerations since that is the only way to increase the value of their bets and to prevent the value from decreasing. Bets may be ‘blocked’ if the arguments they represent are logically inconsistent with others the participant is betting on. This reduces the chance of irrational arguments dominating only because of their popular persuasiveness.

A software prototype will be presented.

Availability

any of those times; earlier times of day preferred

Special Considerations

I intend to share my screen in order to show a software prototype and maybe some slides.

Share

COinS
 

Computer-supported online public deliberation

It is important in democracies that public opinion be formed based on fact and taking into consideration perspectives, preferences, and values of others.

The proposed online discussion forum allows participants to propose policy issues for consideration. Then the participants may exchange pro and con arguments (and other kinds of considerations) in support of or opposed to policy positions. Betting markets are incorporated in a novel way, one or more markets for each argument. Participants attempt to predict the weight of evidence that will eventually be found to support each argument by making bets with play money. The system supports participants in specifying the logical relationships between their arguments, and it uses the logical relationships and the current price together with probability to infer the best estimate of the participants’ collective rational judgement. The market allows participants to regulate the discussion themselves, without moderators. They have an incentive to contribute arguments that will withstand counter-argument and be thought by others to be weighty considerations since that is the only way to increase the value of their bets and to prevent the value from decreasing. Bets may be ‘blocked’ if the arguments they represent are logically inconsistent with others the participant is betting on. This reduces the chance of irrational arguments dominating only because of their popular persuasiveness.

A software prototype will be presented.