Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
argumentation, compromise, conflict, evolution, hope, impasse, Peirce, reason, reasonableness, virtue
Start Date
22-5-2013 9:00 AM
End Date
25-5-2013 5:00 PM
Abstract
If argument forms evolve then the possible existence of localized argument forms may create an interpretive impasse between locally distinct argument communities. Appeal to evolutionarily ‘deep’ argument forms may help, but might be strained in cases where emergent argument forms are not reducible to their base conditions. Overcoming such limits presupposes the virtue of compromise, suggesting that compromise may stand as ‘deep virtue’ within argumentative forms of life.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
William R. Minto, Commentary on: Philip Rose's "Compromise as deep virtue: Evolution and some limits of argumentation"
Reader's Reactions
William R. Minto, Commentary on: Philip Rose's "Compromise as deep virtue: Evolution and some limits of argumentation" (May 2013)
Included in
Compromise as deep virtue: Evolution and some limits of argumentation
University of Windsor
If argument forms evolve then the possible existence of localized argument forms may create an interpretive impasse between locally distinct argument communities. Appeal to evolutionarily ‘deep’ argument forms may help, but might be strained in cases where emergent argument forms are not reducible to their base conditions. Overcoming such limits presupposes the virtue of compromise, suggesting that compromise may stand as ‘deep virtue’ within argumentative forms of life.
