Commentary on: Begoῆa Carrascal's "The practice of arguing and the arguments: Examples from mathematics"

Andrew Aberdein, Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Communication

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Michel Dufour's "Argument and explanation in mathematics"

Andrew Aberdein, Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Communication

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Fallacy and argumentational vice

Andrew Aberdein, Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Communication

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Don't feed the trolls: Straw men and iron men

Scott Aikin, Vanderbilt University, Department of Philosophy
John Casey, Northeastern Illinois University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Robert Pinto's "Truth and the virtue of arguments"

Scott F. Aikin, Vanderbilt University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Fred J. Kauffeld's "The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions"

Derek Allen, University of Toronto, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Pistis - The common Ethos?

Anne-Maren Andersen, N/A

University of WIndsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Anne-Maren Andersen, N/A

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Michael C. Souders' "Khôra, invention, deconstruction and the space of complete surprise"

Satoru Aonuma, Tsuda College, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Dialectic of/or agitation? Rethinking argumentative virtues in Proletarian Elocution

Satoru Aonuma, Tsuda College, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Adam Auch, Dalhousie University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Virtuous argumentation and the challenges of hype

Adam Auch, Dalhousie University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Moira Howes' "Does happiness increase the objectivity of arguers?"

Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University, Department of Education

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Identifying argumentative acts within the classroom amongst engineering students

Juan Fernando Barros-Martinez, Antioquia School of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Robert H. Ennis' "Critical thinking across the curriculum (CTAC)"

Mark Battersby, Capilano University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Critical thinking and cognitive biases

Mark Battersby, Capilano University, Department of Philosophy
Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University, Education

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Considering the roles of values in practical reasoning argumentation evaluation

Michael D. Baumtrog, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Some practical values of argumentation

Laura M. Benacquista, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Assessing presumptions in argumentation: Being a sound presumption vs. being presumably the case

Lilian Bermejo-Luque, University of Granada, Department of Philosophy I

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Olena Yaskorska's "Speech acts, fallacies and dialogue systems"

Lilian Bermejo-Luque, University of Granada, Department of Philosophy I

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Jacky Visser's "A formal account of complex argumentation in a critical discussion"

Lilian Bermejo-Luque, University of Granada, Department of Philosophy I
Alejandro Secades, University of Granada, Department of Philosophy I

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Are conductive arguments really not possible?

J. Anthony Blair, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Jens Kjeldsen's "Virtues of visual argumentation"

J. Anthony Blair, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The epistemic approach to argument evaluation: Virtues, beliefs, commitments

Patrick Bondy, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Geoffrey C. Goddu's "Why I still do not know what a 'real' argument is"

David Botting, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Interpretative dilemmas

David Botting, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Steve Oswald and Christopher Hart's "Trust based on bias: Cognitive constraints on source-related fallacies"

Pierre J. Boulos, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Tone Kvernbekk's "Evidence-based practice (EBP), means-end reasoning and goal directed theories"

Tracy Bowell, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Critical thinking and the argumentational and epistemic virtues

Tracy Bowell, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program
Justine Kingsbury, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Jean Goodwin's "Norms of advocacy"

Camille Cameron, University of Windsor, Faculty of Law

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentative virtues and deep disagreement

Chris Campolo, Hendrix College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Michael Baumtrog's "Considering the roles of values in practical reasoning argumentation evaluation

Chris Campolo, Hendrix College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The practice of arguing and the arguments: Examples from mathematics

Begoῆa Carrascal, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: David Botting's "Interpretative dilemmas"

John Casey, Northeastern Illinois University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Dialogue types: A scale development study

Ioana A. Cionea, University of Oklahoma, Department of Communication
Dale Hample, University of Maryland, Department of Communications
Edward L. Fink, University of Maryland, Department of Communications

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Katharina von Radziewsky's "The virtuous arguer: One person, four characters"

Daniel H. Cohen, Colby College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Victor Ferry's "The virtues of dissoi logoi"

James Crosswhite, Univeristy of Oregon, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Yun Xie, Shuying Shi, Sarah Evans, and Dale Hample's "Exploring the meaning of argument in China"

James Crosswhite, University of Oregon, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Dima Mohammed's "Rationality of argumentation aimed at multiple goals"

Marianne Doury, CNRS Labratoire Communication et Politique

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentery on: David Godden's "On the norms of visual argument"

Ian J. Dove, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Visual arguments and meta-arguments

Ian J. Dove, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argument and explanation in mathematics

Michel Dufour, Sorbonne-Nouvelle, Institut de la Communication et des Médias

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Maurice Finocchiaro's "The fallacy of composition and meta-argumentation"

Michel Dufour, Sorbonne-Nouvelle, Institut de la Communication et des Médias

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Ilan Goldberg, Justine Kingsbury and Tracy Bowell's "Measuring critical thinking about deeply held beliefs"

Robert H. Ennis, University of Illinois, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy of Education

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Critical thinking across the curriculum (CTAC)

Robert H. Ennis, University of Illinois, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy of Education

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Benjamin Hamby's "Willingness to inquire: The cardinal critical thinking virtue"

Frank Fair, Sam Houston State University, Psychology and Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The virtues of dissoi logoi

Victor Ferry, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Research Group in Rhetoric and Linguistic Argumentation (GRAL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Robert C. Rowland's "The debt ceiling and the liberal public sphere"

John E. Fields, Edgewood College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Andrew Aberdein's "Fallacy and argumentational vice"

Maurice A. Finocchiaro, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The fallacy of composition and meta-argumentation

Maurice A. Finocchiaro, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Scott Aikin and John Casey's "Don't feed the trolls: Straw men and iron men"

James B. Freeman, Hunter College of The City University of New York, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What types of arguments are there?

James B. Freeman, Hunter College of The City University of New York, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Andrew Pineau's "The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument

Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam, Speech communication, Argumentation theory and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Charlotte Jørgensen's "Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic: The triad de-campartmentalized"

Michael A. Gilbert, York University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Emotion as permeative: Attempting to model the unidentifiable

Michael A. Gilbert, York University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Chris Campolo's "Argumentative virtues and deep disagreement"

David M. Godden, Old Dominion University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

On the norms of visual argument

David M. Godden, Old Dominion University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Steven W. Patterson's "Are arguments abstract objects?"

G C. Goddu, University of Richmond

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Why I still do not know what a "real" argument is

G C. Goddu, University of Richmond

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Measuring critical thinking about deeply held beliefs

Ilan Goldberg, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program
Justine Kingsbury, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program
Tracy Bowell, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to our commentator

Ilan Goldberg, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program
Justine Kingsbury, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program
Tracy Bowell, University of Waikato, Philosophy Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen's "Argumentative patterns in discourse"

G. Thomas Goodnight, University of Southern California, Annenberg School of Communication

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Menashe Schwed's "Argumentation as an ethical and political choice"

Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Micheael A. Gilbert's "Emotion as permeative: Attempting to model the unidentifiable"

Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Norms of advocacy

Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Jean H. M. Wagemans' "The assessment of argumentation based on abduction"

Thomas F. Gordon, Fraunhofer FOKUS

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Laura M. Benacquista's "Some practical values of argumentation"

Trudy Govier, University of Lethbridge, Philosophy (Emerita)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Reflections on the authority of personal experience

Trudy Govier, University of Lethbridge, Philosophy (Emerita)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Marcin Koszowy's "Polish logical studies from an informal logic perspective"

Nicholas Griffin, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging

Leo Groarke, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Willingness to inquire: The cardinal critical thinking virtue

Benjamin Hamby, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: A. F. Snoeck Henkeman's "The use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage"

Dale Hample, University of Maryland, Department of Communication

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Tracy Bowell and Justine Kingsbury's "Critical thinking and the argumentational and epistemic virtues"

Donald Hatcher, Baker University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Is critical thinking across the curriculum a plausible goal?

Donald L. Hatcher, Baker University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Manfred Kraus' "Arguing or Reasoning? Argumentation in rhetorical context"

A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam, Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory, and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage

A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam, Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory, and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: James B. Freeman's "What types of arguments are there?"

David Hitchcock, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Material consequences and counter-factuals

David Hitchcock, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

David Hitchcock, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Scott Jacobs' "Manipulation as breach of arguer responsibility in 'Welcome to Obamaville'"

Michael H. G. Hoffmann, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, Philosophy Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Paul van den Hoven's "Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration"

Michael J. Hoppmann, Northeastern University, Department of Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Preciseness is a virtue: What are critical questions?

Michael J. Hoppmann, Northeastern University, Department of Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Mark Young's "Virtuous agency as the ground for argument norms"

Moira Howes, Trent University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Does happiness increase the objectivity of arguers?

Moira Howes, Trent University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Mark Aakhus, Smaranda Muresan and Nina Wacholder's "Integrating natural language processing and pragmatic argumentation theories for argumentation support"

Sally Jackson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Communications

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Assimakis Tseronis' "Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying"

Scott Jacobs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Communications

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Manipulation as breach of arguer responsibility in 'Welcome to Obamaville'

Scott Jacobs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Communications

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Adam Auch's "Virtuous argumentation and the challenges of hype"

Ralph H. Johnson, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Defeasibility from the perspective of informal logic

Ralph H. Johnson, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Moira Kloster's "The virtue of restraint: Rebalancing power in arguments"

Charlotte Jørgensen, University of Copenhagan, Department of Media, Cognition, and Communication, Rhetoric Section

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Rhetoric, dialectic and logic: The triad de-compartmentalized

Charlotte Jørgensen, University of Copenhagan, Department of Media, Cognition, and Communication, Rhetoric Section

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Juhani Rudanko's "Identifying a new type of fallacy in political discourse"

David Kary, Law School Admission Council, Test Development

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Critical thinking and epistemic responsibility

David Kary, Law School Admission Council, Test Development

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Lilian Bermejo-Luque's "Assessing presumptions in argumentation: Being a sound presumpion vs. being presumably the case"

Fred J. Kauffeld, Edgewood College, Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions

Fred J. Kauffeld, Edgewood College, Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Ian Dove's "Visual arguments and meta-arguments"

Jens E. Kjeldsen, University of Bergen, Department of Information Science and Media Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Virtues of visual argumentation: How pictures make the importance and strength of an argument salient

Jens E. Kjeldsen, University of Bergen, Department of Information Science and Media Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Suzanne McMurphy's "Trust, distrust, and trustworthiness in argumentation: Virtues and fallacies

Moira Kloster, University of the Fraser Valley, Department of Philosophy and Politics

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The virtue of restraint: Rebalancing power in arguments

Moira Kloster, University of the Fraser Valley, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Jerry Petersen's "The failure of certainty: Why economics needs rhetoric"

Christian Kock, University of Copenhagan, Department of Media, Cognition, and Communication, Rhetoric Section

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate

Christian Kock, University of Copenhagan, Department of Media, Cognition, and Communication, Rhetoric Section

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Polish logical studies from an informal logic perspective

Marcin Koszowy, University of Bialystok

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Douglas Walton and Thomas F. Gordon's "How to formalize informal logic"

Marcin Koszowy, University of Bailystok, Department of Logic, Informatics and Philosophy of Science
Marcin Selinger, University of Wroclaw, Department of Logic and Methodology of Science

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Arguing or reasoning? Argumentation in rhetorical context

Manfred Kraus, University of Tübingen, Philologisches Seminar

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Fabrizio Macagno's "What we hide in words: Value-based reasoning and emotive language"

Manfred Kraus, University of Tübingen, Philologisches Seminar

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Manfred Kraus, University of Tübingen, Philologisches Seminar

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Laura Elizabeth Pinto's "When politics trump argumentation: Financial literacy education policy

Tone Kvernbekk, University of Oslo, Department of Educational Research

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Evidence-based practice (EBP), means-end reasoning and goal directed theories

Tone Kvernbekk, University of Oslo, Department of Educational Research

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Sheldon Wein's "Exploring the virtues (and vices) of zero tolerance arguments"

Marcin Lewiński, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Polylogical fallacies: Are there any?

Marcin Lewiński, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Marcin Lewiński, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Trudy Govier's "Reflections on the authority of personal experience"

Maureen Linker, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Department of Literature, Philosophy, & the Arts

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Practical arguments for prudential justifications of actions

Christoph Lumer, University of Siena, DISPOC

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Jan Albert van Laar's "Criticism in need of clarification"

Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What we hide in words: Value-based reasoning and emotive language

Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: David Hitchcock's "Material consequences and counter-factuals"

Brian MacPherson, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The incompleteness problem for a virtue-based theory of argumentation

Brian MacPherson, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Trust, distrust, and trustworthiness in argumentation: Virtues and fallacies

Suzanne McMurphy, University of Windsor, School of Social Work

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Philip Rose's "Compromise as deep virtue: Evolution and some limits of argumentation"

William R. Minto, N/A

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Marta Zampa’s “The editorial meeting discussion as an argumentative activity type”

Dima Mohammed, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Rationality of argumentation aimed at multiple goals

Dima Mohammed, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, ArgLab, Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Denying the antecedent and conditional perfection again

Andrei Moldovan, University of Salamanca, Departmento de Filosofia, Logica y Estética

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Narrative, intersectionality and argumentative discourse

Justin Ross Morris, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Satoru Aonuma's "Dialectic of/or agitation? Rethinking argumentative virtues in Proletarian Elocution"

Jeff Noonan, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Receptivity as a virtue of (Practitioners of) argumentation

Kathryn J. Norlock, Trent University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Justin Ross Morris' "Narrative, intersectionality and argumentative discourse"

Paula Olmos, National University for Distance Learning (UNED), Department of Logic, History and Philosophy of Science

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Narration as argument

Paula Olmos, National University for Distance Learning (UNED), Department of Logic, History and Philosophy of Science

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Frank Zenker's "Know thy biases! Bringing argumentative virtues to the classroom"

Steve Oswald, University of Neuchâtel, Cognitive Science Centre

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Trust based on bias: Cognitive constraints on source-related fallacies

Steve Oswald, University of Neuchâtel, Cognitive Science Centre
Christopher Hart, Northumbria University, Department of Humanities

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentation, decision and rationality

Fabio Paglieri, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ISTS-CRN), Instituto di Scienze e Technologie della Cognizione, Goal-Oriented Agents Lab (GOAL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Ralph H. Johnson's "Defeasibility from the perspective of informal logic"

Fabio Paglieri, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ISTS-CRN), Instituto di Scienze e Technologie della Cognizione, Goal-Oriented Agents Lab (GOAL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Fabio Paglieri, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ISTS-CRN), Instituto di Scienze e Technologie della Cognizione, Goal-Oriented Agents Lab (GOAL)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Are arguments abstract objects?

Steven W. Patterson, Marygrove College, Department of Philosophy, Religious Studies and Humanities

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Fabio Paglieri's "Argumentation, decision and rationality"

Steven W. Patterson, Marygrove College, Department of Philosophy, Religious Studies and Humanities

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The failure of certainty: Why economics needs rhetoric

Jerry Petersen, Utah Valley University, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument

Andrew Pineau, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

When politics trump argumentation: Financial literacy education policy

Laura Elizabeth Pinto, Niagara University, College of Education

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Harvey Siegal's "Argumentation and epistemology of disagreement"

Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Truth and the virtue of arguments

Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Chiara Pollaroli's "T(r)opical patterns in advertising"

Gilbert Plumer, Law School Admission Council, Test Development

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Chiara Pollaroli, University of Lugano, Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

T(r)opical patterns in advertising

Chiara Pollaroli, University of Lugano, Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Andrei Moldovan's "Denying the antecedent and conditional perfection again"

Lawrence H. Powers, Wayne State University, Department of Philosophy (Emeritus)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Minghui Xiong's "Confucian philosophical argumentation skills"

Lawrence H. Powers, Wayne State University, Emeritus Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What argumentation (theory) can do for philosophy in the 21st century

Henrique Jales Ribeiro, University of Coimbra, Department of Philosophy, Communication and Information

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Kathryn J. Norlock's "Receptivity as a virtue of (practitioners of) argumentation"

Phyllis Rooney, Oakland University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Mark Weinstein's "Emerging truth and the defeat of scientific racism"

Philip Rose, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Compromise as deep virtue: Evolution and some limits of argumentation

Philip Rose, University of Windsor, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: David Zarefsky's "The 'comeback' second Obama-Romney debate and the virtues of argumentation"

Robert C. Rowland, University of Kansas, Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The debt ceiling and the liberal public sphere

Robert C. Rowland, University of Kansas, Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Identifying a new type of fallacy in political discourse

Juhani Rudanko, University of Tampere, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Juhani Rudanko, University of Tampere, Department of English

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Patrick Bondy's "The epistemic approach to argument evaluation: Virtues, beliefs, commitments"

Bruce Russell, Wayne State University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentation as an ethical and political choice

Menashe Schwed, Ashkelon Academic College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Christoph Lumer's "Practical arguments for prudential justifications of actions"

Menashe Schwed, Ashkelon Academic College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Don Hatcher's "Is critical thinking across curriculum a plausible goal?"

Michael Scriven, Claremont Graduate University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentation and the epistemology of disagreement

Harvey Siegal, University of Miami, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Khôra, invention, deconstruction and the space of complete surprise

Michael C. Souders, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Department of Communication Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Henrique Jales Ribeiro's "What argumentation (theory) can do for philosophy in the 21st century"

Christopher W. Tindale, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Paula Olmos' "Narrative as argument"

Christopher W. Tindale, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying

Assimakis Tseronis, University of Amsterdam, Media Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Leo Groarke's "On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging"

Assimakis Tseronis, University of Amsterdam, Media Studies

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Anne-Maren Andersen's "Pistis - The common Ethos?"

Paul van den Hoven, Utrecht University, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration

Paul van den Hoven, Utrecht University, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentative patterns in discourse

Frans H. van Eemeren, University of Amsterdam, ILIAS & Speech Communication, Argumentation theory and Rhetoric
Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam, ILIAS & Speech Communication, Argumentation theory and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Cathal Woods' "The language and diagramming of rejection and objection"

Jan Albert van Laar, University of Groningen, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Criticism in need of clarification

Jan Albert van Laar, University of Groningen

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

A formal account of complex argumentation in a critical discussion

Jacky Visser, University of Amsterdam, Speech communication, Argumentation theory and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The virtuous arguer: One person, four characters

Katharina von Radziewsky, McMaster University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Michael Hoppmann's "Preciseness is a virtue: What are critical questions?"

Jean H. M. Wagemans, University of Amsterdam, Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory, and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The assessment of argumentation based on abduction

Jean H. M. Wagemans, University of Amsterdam, Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory, and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Ionana Cionea, Dale Hample, and Edward Fink's "Dialogue types: A scale development study"

Douglas Walton, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

How to formalize informal logic

Douglas Walton, University of Windsor, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric
Thomas F. Gordon, Fraunhofer FOKUS

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Brian MacPherson's "The incompleteness problem for a virtue-based theory of argumentation"

Sheldon Wein, Saint Mary's University, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Exploring the virtues (and vices) of zero tolerance arguments

Sheldon Wein, Saint Mary's University, Department of Philosophy and International Development Studies Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Response to my commentator

Sheldon Wein, Saint Mary's University, Department of Philosophy and International Development Studies Program

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Emerging truth and the defeat of scientific racism

Mark Weinstein, Monclair State University, Educational Foundations

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Marcin Lewiński's "Polylogical fallacies: Are there any?"

Cathal Woods, Virginia Wesleyan College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The language and diagramming of rejection and objection

Cathal Woods, Virginia Wesleyan College, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Exploring the meaning of agurment in China

Yun Xie, Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic and Cognition
Dale Hample, University of Maryland, Department of Communication
Shuying Shi
Sarah Evans

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: J. Anthony Blair's "Are conductive arguments really not possible?"

Yun Xie, Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic and Cognition, Department of Philosohy
Min Ghui Xiong, Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic and Cognition, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Confucian philosophical argumentation skills

Minghui Xiong, Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic & Cognition and Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Speech acts, fallacies and dialogue systems

Olena Yaskorska, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Conveying argumentation through multimodal discourse

Yang Ying, Xiamen University, School of Journalism and Communication

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Virtuous agency as the ground for argument norms

Mark C. Young, Lakehead University, Orillia Campus, Department of Philosophy

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The editorial meeting discussion as an argumentative activity type

Marta Zampa, University of Lugano, Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Christian Kock's "Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate"

David Zarefsky, Northwestern University, Department of Communication Studies (Emeritus)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The 'comeback' second Obama-Romney debate and virtues of argumentation

David Zarefsky, Northwestern University, Department of Communication Studies (Emeritus)

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on: Mark Battersby and Sharon Bailin's "Critical thinking and cognitive biases"

Frank Zenker, Lund University, Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Know thy biases! Bringing argumentative virtues to the classroom

Frank Zenker, Lund University, Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science

University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM