2020 | ||
Saturday, June 6th | ||
---|---|---|
8:00 AM |
The Problem of Mission Creep: Argumentation Theory meets Military History Tone Kvernbekk, University of Oslo Room 3 8:00 AM - 8:00 AM |
|
8:00 AM |
Argumentation in Philosophical Practice: An Empirical Study Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology - Melbourne Room 2 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:00 AM |
Why missing premises can be missed: Evaluating arguments by determining their lever Jean H.M. Wagemans, University of Amsterdam Room 1 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:01 AM |
Comments on Wagemans' "Argument levers" Hans Vilhelm Hansen, University of Windsor Room 1 8:01 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:01 AM |
Commentary on "The Problem of Mission Creep" Curtis Scott Jacobs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Room 3 8:01 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
8:01 AM |
Christoph Lumer, University of Siena Room 2 8:01 AM - 9:00 AM |
|
9:00 AM |
Jens E. Kjeldsen, University of Bergen, Department of Information Science and Media Studies Room 2 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:00 AM |
Connectives and Straw Men. Experimental approach on French and English. Jennifer Schumann, University of Berne Room 1 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:00 AM |
The Notion of On-balance Premise Reconsidered Robert Xie Room 3 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:01 AM |
Commentary on Yun Xie's "The Notion of On-Balance Premise Reconsidered" Derek Allen, University of Toronto Room 3 9:01 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:01 AM |
Jan Albert van Laar, University of Groningen Room 1 9:01 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
9:01 AM |
Commentary on Jens Kjeldsen’s “What makes us change our minds in everyday life?” Harry Weger Jr., University of Central Florida Room 2 9:01 AM - 10:00 AM |
|
10:00 AM |
Between Evidence and Facts: An Argumentative Perspective of Legal Evidence Wenjing Du, East China University of Political Science and Law, Wenbo Academy Room 2 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:00 AM |
Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Room 3 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:00 AM |
Piggybacking In? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Argumentation Schemes Harmony Peach, University of Windsor Room 1 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:01 AM |
Commentary on Macagno and Rapanta, “Coding empathy” José Ángel Gascón, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción Room 3 10:01 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:01 AM |
Moira L. Kloster, University of the Fraser Valley Room 1 10:01 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:01 AM |
Evidence in Argumentation-Based Litigation (ALG): Comments on Xiong's and Du's Paper Marko Novak, New University, European Faculty of Law Room 2 10:01 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
10:03 AM |
Reply to Commentary on “Between Evidence and Facts: An Argumentative Perspective of Legal Evidence” Wenjing Du, East China University of Political Science and Law, Wenbo Academy Room 2 10:03 AM - 11:00 AM |
|
11:00 AM |
Presumptions, burdens of proof, and explanations Petar Bodlović, Faculty of Philosophy (Department of Theoretical Philosophy), University of Groningen, The Netherlands Room 3 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:00 AM |
Marcin Lewinski, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Room 2 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:00 AM |
Where do you place your argument? Christina Pontoppidan, University of Southern Denmark Room 1 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:01 AM |
John P. Casey, Northeastern Illinois University Room 2 11:01 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:01 AM |
Commentary on Petar Bodlović: "Presumptions, burdens of proof, and explanations" David Godden, Philosophy, Michigan State University Room 3 11:01 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
11:01 AM |
Manfred E. Kraus, University of Tübingen Room 1 11:01 AM - 12:00 PM |
|
2:00 PM |
Whataboutisms, Arguments and Argumentative Harm Tracy A. Bowell, University of Waikato Room 1 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:00 PM |
Curtis Scott Jacobs, University of Illinois Room 2 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM |
|
2:01 PM |
A Commentary on Tracy Bowell’s “Whataboutisms, Arguments and Argumentative Harm” Mark Battersby, Critical Inquiry Group Room 1 2:01 PM - 3:00 PM |