Location
McMaster University
Document Type
Restricted Access
Start Date
1-6-2005 9:00 AM
End Date
1-6-2005 5:00 PM
Abstract
In The Uses of Argument, Toulmin takes great effort to ensure that, although not formally, good argument is experienced as a logical enterprise. However, such an informally logically driven theory of argumentation cannot take into account the persuasive effects inherent in argumentative discourse that move a given audience to accept a claim. I argue that, while Toulmin's model is a commendable step towards a rhetorical theory of argumentation, he misses two important rhetorical principles: 1. Arguments will always have rhetorically persuasive components that cannot be evaluated in terms of logical validity. 2. Good arguments are lasting arguments that stay with the audience.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Included in
The Uses of Rhetorical Argument
McMaster University
In The Uses of Argument, Toulmin takes great effort to ensure that, although not formally, good argument is experienced as a logical enterprise. However, such an informally logically driven theory of argumentation cannot take into account the persuasive effects inherent in argumentative discourse that move a given audience to accept a claim. I argue that, while Toulmin's model is a commendable step towards a rhetorical theory of argumentation, he misses two important rhetorical principles: 1. Arguments will always have rhetorically persuasive components that cannot be evaluated in terms of logical validity. 2. Good arguments are lasting arguments that stay with the audience.
