Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
virtue epistemology, virtues of argumentation
Start Date
22-5-2013 9:00 AM
End Date
25-5-2013 5:00 PM
Abstract
This paper will have two parts. In the first, it will point out the agreement between lists of paradigm epistemic and argumentative virtues, and it will take that agreement as prima facie support for the epistemic approach to argument evaluation. Second, it will consider the disagreement over whether successful argument resolution requires change of belief or whether it only requires change of commitment. It turns out that the epistemic approach is neutral on that question.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Bruce Russell, Commentary on: Patrick Bondy's "The epistemic approach to argument evaluation: Virtues, beliefs, commitments"
Reader's Reactions
Bruce Russell, Commentary on: Patrick Bondy's "The epistemic approach to argument evaluation: Virtues, beliefs, commitments" (May 2013)
Included in
The epistemic approach to argument evaluation: Virtues, beliefs, commitments
University of Windsor
This paper will have two parts. In the first, it will point out the agreement between lists of paradigm epistemic and argumentative virtues, and it will take that agreement as prima facie support for the epistemic approach to argument evaluation. Second, it will consider the disagreement over whether successful argument resolution requires change of belief or whether it only requires change of commitment. It turns out that the epistemic approach is neutral on that question.
