Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
Biro-Siegel, emotion, gender and emotion, reason
Start Date
22-5-2013 9:00 AM
End Date
25-5-2013 5:00 PM
Abstract
The question of emotion in argumentation has received considerable attention in recent years. But there is a tension between the traditional normative role of informal logic, and the inclusion of emotion which is viewed as notoriously unstable. Here I argue that that, a] there is always emotion in an argument; b] that the presence of emotion is a good thing; and c] that we can and ought model and teach the use of emotion in Argumentation Theory.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Jean Goodwin, Commentary on: Micheael A. Gilbert's "Emotion as permeative: Attempting to model the unidentifiable"
Reader's Reactions
Jean Goodwin, Commentary on: Micheael A. Gilbert's "Emotion as permeative: Attempting to model the unidentifiable" (May 2013)
Included in
Emotion as permeative: Attempting to model the unidentifiable
University of Windsor
The question of emotion in argumentation has received considerable attention in recent years. But there is a tension between the traditional normative role of informal logic, and the inclusion of emotion which is viewed as notoriously unstable. Here I argue that that, a] there is always emotion in an argument; b] that the presence of emotion is a good thing; and c] that we can and ought model and teach the use of emotion in Argumentation Theory.
