Location
University of Windsor
Document Type
Paper
Keywords
Doggett, Dove, Groarke, Johnson, repackaging, visual argument, visual evidence
Start Date
22-5-2013 9:00 AM
End Date
25-5-2013 5:00 PM
Abstract
In “Image, Evidence, Argument,” Ian Dove defends an intriguing ‘middle ground’ between those who argue that there are “visual arguments” (notably Groarke) and skeptics who argue that there are not (notably Johnson). I discuss one of Dove’s key examples, proposing a different analysis of it, arguing that there are problems with the “verbal repackaging” of the argument he suggests.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Response to Submission
Assimakis Tseronis, Commentary on: Leo Groarke's "On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging"
Reader's Reactions
Assimakis Tseronis, Commentary on: Leo Groarke's "On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging" (May 2013)
Included in
On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging
University of Windsor
In “Image, Evidence, Argument,” Ian Dove defends an intriguing ‘middle ground’ between those who argue that there are “visual arguments” (notably Groarke) and skeptics who argue that there are not (notably Johnson). I discuss one of Dove’s key examples, proposing a different analysis of it, arguing that there are problems with the “verbal repackaging” of the argument he suggests.
