Commentary on Freeman

Derek Allen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Lessons from ten years of research on argument

Richard Andrews, Institute of Education University of London

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Truth and Reconciliation: Comments on Coalescence

Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Andrews

Deborah Berril

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Danblon

Jerome Bickenbach

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Forde

Jerome Bickenbach

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Sillince

Bishop

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

A Theory of Normative Reasoning Schemes

J Anthony Blair, University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Siegel

J Anthony Blair

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Aristotle: an ancient mathematical logician

George Boger, Canisius College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Lavery & Mitscherling

George Boger

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What are we do about traditional logic?

Jesse Bohl, William and Mary University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The riddle as argument: Zarathustra's riddle and the eternal return

Richard S G Brown, Brock University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Fallacies and the preconditions of argumentation

Chris Campolo, Hendrix College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Reasons for reason-giving in unplanned discourse

Martha Sylvia Cheng, Rollins College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Kagan

Daniel H. Cohen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Once upon an argument: Being the account of a dialogue between a poet and a philosopher, both ancient

Daniel H. Cohen, Colby College
John Rosenwald, Beloit College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What jokes can tell us about arguments

Thomas M. Conley, University of Illinois

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Skakoon

James Crosswhite

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Nature and Reason: Inertia and Argumentation

James Crosswhite, University of Oregon

Brock University, St Catharines

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Justification, commonplaces and evidence

Emmanuelle Danblon, University of Brussels

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Critical thinking, charity and care: reason and goodness both

Jacqueline M. Davies, Queens University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Schachter

Jcaqueline M. Davies

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Slade

Drake

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Vorster & Botha

Farrell

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Ruhl

Eveline T. Feteris

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Wales

Eveline T. Feteris

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Pragmatic argumentation and the application of legal rules

Eveline T. Feteris, University of Amsterdam

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Gender and rhetoric in category construction

Carmel Forde, Dalhousie University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Blair

James B. Freeman

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The truth about truth as a condition of premise adequacy

James B. Freeman, Hunter College of The City University of New York

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

A consideration of empathy in argumentation

Richard Friemann, York University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Gilbert

Richard Fulkerson

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Groarke

Richard Fulkerson

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Goodwin

Mark Gellis

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Sermons of corporate identity: argument in two corporate annual reports

Mark Gellis, Kettering University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Woods

Rolf George

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Reygadas & Haidar

Michael Gilbert

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Bailin

Michael A. Gilbert

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Agreement

Michael Anthony Gilbert, York University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Psychologism in contemporary argumentation theory

Daivd M. Godden, University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Cicero's authority

Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Hegelund & Kock

Jean Goodwin

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Does an appeal to tradition rest on mistaken reasoning?

Jim Gough, Red Deer College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Cohen & Rosenwald

Trudy Govier

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Friemann

Claude Gratton

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Gough

Claude Gratton

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Slob

Wayne Grennan

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Vassiliev

Wayne Grennan

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Allan

Leo Groarke

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Hoaglund

Leo Groarke

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Seduction as deduction: persuasion as deductive argument

Leo Groarke, University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Towards an integrated theory of argumentation

Julieta Haidar, Escuela Nacional de Antropologia e Historia
Pedro Reygadas, Escuela Nacional de Antropologia e Historia

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Zagar

Hans V. Hansen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Macro-Toulmin: the argument model as structural guideline in academic writing

Signe Hegelund, University of Copenhagen
Christian Kock, University of Copenhagen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Plumer

David Hitchcock

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

John L. Pollock's theory of rationality

David Hitchcock, McMaster University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Campolo

John Hoaglund

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Inference and argument in informal logic

John Hoaglund, Christopher Newport University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Mifsud

Hanns Hohmann

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Presumption in legal argumentation: from antiquity to the middle ages

Hanns Hohmann, San Jose State University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Turner

Hudecki

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Are economists rational or just different?

Tammy James, Brock University
Lewis Saroka, Brock University
John Benjafield, Brock University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Kauffeld

Ralph H. Johnson

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

More on arguers and their dialectical obligations

Ralph H. Johnson, University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Persuasive stories

Michael Kagan, Le Moyne College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Cheng

Fred Kauffeld

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Dialectical tier argumentation as structured by proposing and advising

Fred J. Kauffeld, Edgewood College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

On the educational value of arguing in indirectly informative language

Maged El Komos, Trent University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The problem of retraction in critical discussion

Erik C W Krabbe, University of Groningen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Johnson

Erik C W Krabe

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

An Aristotelian program for teaching argumentation

Jonathan Lavery, Wilfrid Laurier
Jeff Mitscherling, University of Guelph

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Brown

James Lawler

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Novak

Jill LeBlanc

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Gellis

Michael Leff

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Feteris

Michael Manley-Casimir

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Plug

Michael Manley-Casimir

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Another reformulation of rhetoric as a wedge

Mari Lee Mifsud, University of Richmond

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Hohmann

Mari Lee Mifsud

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Viminitz

Narveson

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Alfred Sidgwick's 'rogative' approach to argumentation

Flemming Steen Nielsen, University of Copenhagen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Mutual reconstruction of arguments in dialogue

Niels Moeller Nielsen, Roskilde University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Aristotle's Topics and informal reasoning

Joseph Novak, University of Waterloo

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The utility of Perelman's universal audience

Niel Paris, Brock University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Benjafield, James & Saroka

Robert C. Pinto

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Logical form and the link between premise and conclusion

Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The analysis and evaluation of counter-arguments in judicial decisions

José Plug, University of Amsterdam

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Bohl

Gilbert Plumer

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The paradoxical associated conditional of enthymemes

Gilbert Plumer, Law School Admission Council

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Schwed

Lawrence Powers

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

A problem in the one-fallacy theory

Lawrence H. Powers, Wayne State University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Layered protocols in coalescent argumentation

Allan Randall, York University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Building monologue

Chris Reed, University of Dundee

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Krabbe

Chris Reed

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Observer and participant perspectives in the analysis of argumentation

Marco Ruhl

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Prejudice, prudence and fairness

Jean-Pierre Schachter, Huron College, University of Western Ontario

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Liar Paradox as a reductio ad absurdum argument

Menashe Schwed, Ashkelon Academic College

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Augustus de Morgan on fallacy: pettyfoggers and controversialists

Marie Secor, Pennsylvania State University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argument Quality and Cultural Difference

Harvey Siegel, University of Miami

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Power and topic shifts in strategic management argumentation

John A A Sillince, University of London

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Hermeneutics, rhetoric and informal logic

Elizabeth Skakoon, McMaster University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Godden

Christina Slade

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Speaking of South Park

Christina Slade, University Sydney

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

But that simply isn't true; rethinking truth in argumentation

Wouter H. Slob, University of Groningen

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Theoretic bondage: Coalescent argumentation and higher-order goals

Denise Tayler, York University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Bakhtin's dialogism and argumentation perspectives

Viktor Tchouechov, Vitebsk State Technological University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Are all the pragma-dialectical rules pragmatic?

Christopher M. Thomson, University of Toronto

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Paris

Christopher M. Thomson

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Crosswhite

Christopher W. Tindale

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Fallacies and the concept of an argument

Dale Turner, California State Polytechnic University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The functional nature of argument revisited

Lev G. Vassiliev, Kaluga State Pedagogical University

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Deer Hunter Paradox

Paul Viminitz, University of Lethbridge

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Pinto

Mark Vorobej

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Argumentation topoi and South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Committee

Johannes N. Vorster, University of South Africa
Pieter J J Botha, University of South Africa

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

THEORETIC BONDAGE:ARGUMENTATION ANALYSIS AND HIGHER-ORDER GOALS

Denis May Wales

Brock University, St. Catharines

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on F S Nielsen

Douglas Walton

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Reed

Douglas Walton

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on N M Nielsen

James Wong

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Boger

John Woods

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Does informal logic have anything to learn from fuzzy logic?

John Woods, University of British Columbia

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Commentary on Thomson

Igor Zagar

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

What about the context?

Igor Z. Zagar

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM