Thursday

Subscribe to RSS Feed

2020
Thursday, June 4th
8:00 AM

Public Deliberation and Epistemic Parity in Direct Democracies

Léa Farine, University of Neuchâtel

Room 1

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

Listen carefully! Fallacious auditory arguments_presentation recording

Gabrijela Kisicek, University of Zagreb

Room 1

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

8:01 AM

Commentary on Léa Farine, “Public Deliberation and Epistemic Parity in Direct Democracies”

Dale Hample, dhample@umd.edu

Room 1

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

Commentary Hoppmann on Kišiček Listen Carefully

Michael J. Hoppmann, Northeastern University

Room 3

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

Commentary on Anne-Marie McCallion's "Adversity and Attrition: Disassociated Disagreement and Extracted Speech in Undergraduate Philosophers

Philip Rose, University of Windsor

Room 2

8:01 AM - 9:00 AM

9:00 AM

Unpacking the narrative-argumentative conundrum: story credibility revisited

Jarmila Bubikova-Moan, Kristiania University College

Room 1

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

What Makes a Fallacy Serious?

Michel Dufour, University Sorbonne-Nouvelle

Room 3

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Rights of Nature and Indigenous Cosmovision: A Fundamental Inquiry

Jingjing Wu, Tilburg University

Room 2

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM

9:01 AM

Comments on Dufour on Walton

Hans Vilhelm Hansen, University of Windsor

Room 3

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

Commentary on Jarmila Bubikova-Moan’s “Unpacking the narrative-argumentative conundrum: story credibility revisited”

Paula Olmos, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Room 1

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

Commentary: Wu’s “Indigenous Cosmovision and Rights of Nature: A Legal Inquiry”

Andrea G. Sullivan-Clarke, U of Windsor

Room 2

9:01 AM - 10:00 AM

10:00 AM

Diversity, conflict resolution, and (dis)agreement

Linda Carozza, York University

Room 3

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Persuading and convincing

Adelino Cattani, University of Padua

Room 1

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

“Identity-Based” and “Diversity-Based” Evidence Between Linear and Fractal Rationality

Maurizio Manzin, University of Trento

Room 2

10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

10:01 AM

Commentary on: Linda Carozza’s “Diversity, conflict, and (dis)agreement”

Sally Jackson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Room 3

10:01 AM - 11:00 AM

Should logos be opposed to ethos? Commentary on Adelino Cattani’s ‘Persuading and convincing’

Marcin Koszowy, Warsaw University of Technology

Room 1

10:01 AM - 11:00 AM

11:00 AM

Diversity in Argumentation Theory

Claudio Duran, York University
Eva Hamamé

Room 3

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

The Value of Judgmental Subjectivity

Paula Olmos, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Room 1

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

The acquisition of scientific evidence between Frye and Daubert. From ad hominem arguments to cross-examination among experts

Lorenzo Zoppellari, University of Trento

Room 2

11:00 AM - 12:00 PM

11:01 AM

Commentary: Scientific Evidence - From a "Deferent" to a "Novice" Judge: Comments on Zoppellari's Paper

Marko Novak, New University, European Faculty of Law

Room 2

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

Commentary on: “Diversity in Argumentation Theory” (by Claudio Duran & Eva Hamamé)

Dimitris Serafis, USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

Room 3

11:01 AM - 12:00 PM

2:00 PM

Is There a Role for Adversariality in Teaching Critical Thinking?

Sharon Bailin, Simon Fraser University
Mark Battersby, Capilano University

Room 1

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Understanding the Embrace of Fallacy: A multi-modal analysis

Michael A. Gilbert, York University

Room 2

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Deep Disagreements and Some Resolution Strategies that Simply Won't Do

Jason E. Schultchen, University of Lethbridge

Room 3

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

2:01 PM

Commentary on: Michael Gilbert’s “Understanding the embrace of fallacy: A multi-modal analysis”

Jean Goodwin, North Carolina State University

Room 2

2:01 PM - 3:00 PM

Commentary on Jason Schultchen’s “Deep disagreements and some resolution strategies that simply won’t do”

David Hitchcock, McMaster University

Room 3

2:01 PM - 3:00 PM

3:00 PM

The End of Argument

Leo Groarke, Trent University

Room 2

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Evidence Based Medicine and Contemporary Vaccine Hesitancy

Tarun Kattumana, KU Leuven

Room 1

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Assessing Evidence Relevance by Disallowing Assessment

John Licato, University of South Florida
Michael Cooper, University of South Florida

Room 3

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Assessing Evidence Relevance by Disallowing Assessment (Video Lecture)

John Licato, University of South Florida
Michael Cooper

Room 3

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

3:01 PM

Commentary: Critique of “Evidence Based Medicine and Contemporary Vaccine Hesitancy”

Brian Macpherson

Room 1

3:01 PM - 4:00 PM